Fire is one of the major accident hazards and effects from flammable releases contribute to the risk from the process plant.
The three essential conditions for fire are fuel, oxygen and heat. The nature and presence of each of these decides the combustion process and the effects from it. Depending on the release phase (solid, liquid or gas), release velocity (flammable mixture available for combustion), and availability (and nature) of source of ignition the chemical reaction could result in different forms. The fire may be classified as jet flames, liquid fires (pool and running/drain), vapour cloud fires (with or without explosion), solid fires (solid materials, dust), warehouse fires and fires associated with oxygen.
Some potential ignition sources on process plants include naked flames, hot surfaces, hot particles, hot work, chemical energy, engines, vehicles, lightning, smoking, hot materials, hot gases, reactive materials, Pyrophoric materials, radio frequency emission, electrical equipment, static electricity, self-heating, arson and sabotage (more information can be found in Table 16.24, FPLees Loss Prevention and Process Safety, 3rd Edition).
Most of the issues related to explosion prevention and protection are addressed by ATEX Directive [http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/atex/dir92-en.pdf]
In the UK, the requirements are as per DSEAR [http://www.hse.gov.uk/fireandexplosion/atex.htm]
Estimation of risk and probability of ignition:
Individual risk from an event resulting in fire (flammable effects) can be determined by
Individual risk = failure rate x ignition probability x fractional time of attendance x vulnerability
Where,
failure rate is the estimated frequency (per year) of the event that gives rise to the release scenario.
Ignition probability is the The probability that the release will ignite given that the failure has occurred (normally based on the release rate, see table below)
Fractional time of attendance is the maximum proportion of an individual’s time that is spent inside the building under consideration. This is fixed throughout representing one person for 40 hours a week.
A guide on selection of ignition probability for gaseous release is given in the following table.
IGNITION PROBABILITIES FOR GASEOUS RELEASES
Leak (kg/s) Probability of ignition
Gaseous release
Minor (<1) : 0.01
Major (1-50) : 0.07
Massive (>50) : 0.3
Liquid release
Minor (<1) 0.01
Major (1-50) 0.03
Massive (>50) 0.08
Courtesy: Cox, A.W., Lees, F.P. & Ang, M.L.; Classification of Hazardous Locations; IIGCHL, IChemE.; 1990
More information on ignition probability, is available in the IP research report., Ignition probability review, model development and look-up correlations, Published by Energy Institute, London, Jan 2006
Note: This is a small note on a factor that need to be considered while quantifying risk in process industry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- SreeRaj R Nair
- Professional practising process safety and loss prevention. Areas of expertise include: • Hazard identification, Consequence modelling and analysis • Risk evaluation (qualitative and quantitative) • Identify and evaluate cost-effective engineering solutions to reduce or mitigate risk • Emergency planning and preparedness • HSE training and audits
Publications by Author
- Identifying Opportunities of Enhancing Safeguard Stewardship through IPL Rationalization, Global Congress on Process Safety, AIChE, March 2017
- Identifying and managing process risks related to biofule project and plants, HAZARDS XXII, April 2011
- Essence of the accuracy and acceptability of failure rate data in risk assessment, HAZARDS XXII, April 2011
- Improving process safety performance using process hazard information, ChemInnovations, Oct 2010
- Analysing the effectiveness of risk reduciton measures implemented, 13th Internationa Symposium on Loss prevention, June 2010
- Determining process safety performance indicators for major accident hazards using site process hazard information, HAZARDS XXI, Nov 2009
- Using predictive risk assessment to develop user-friendly tools for on-site and off-site emergency planning, HAZARDS XXi Nov 2009
- Process Safety - staying ahead, The Chemical Engineer, IChemE, Oct 2009
- SreeRaj R Nair, Determining the criteria for evaluation of toxic hazards, Journal of HSE and Fire Engineering, ASFE CUSAT, Issue 2 March 2009
- S R Nair, Methods of avoiding tank bund overtopping using computational fluid dynamics tool, Paper 40, Page 479-495, HAZARDS XX, April 2008
- Sreeraj R Nair, A review on Buncefield oil storage incident investigation, Petrosafe-07, April 2007
- Sreeraj R Nair, Safety studies through project life cycle, Fire and Safety Journal, ASFE CUSAT, October 2006
No comments:
Post a Comment