The term ‘risk’ is a term used quite often and in day to day life. Risk is defined and represented in different ways based on the associated activity and its nature. Risk consists of a combination of the probability of a perceived threat or opportunity occurring and the magnitude of its impact on objectives.
In process and manufacturing industries (not exclusive), most commonly, risk is assessed, analysed and expressed in terms of individual risk and societal risk. The risk estimation and analysis is to ensure that the risk an industrial activity is not resulting in intolerable levels.
Risk is perceived in terms of the severity from an event and its frequency. The fact to be noted is that those events with minimal severity but frequent posses similar risk to those events with maximum severity but not that frequent. The everyday activities like smoking (including passive) and driving (including being on road or on a means of transport) also could result in fatality and keep public at higher risk. These events may not be often classified as severe but happen quite frequently.
Then there are near-to-known or unknown treats like dust explosions and exposure to asbestos. The risk from such activities is seldom assessed due to lack of knowledge on the potential consequence. This raises the question on perceiving risk from potential major incidents. Even though the severity is estimated and well understood, it is often neglected considering as not likely.
An example: Catastrophic failure of a hazardous material storage tank could result in multiple fatalities and the recorded failure frequency is one in a million years (1 x 10-6 /yr). There are more than a million tanks which could result in similar catastrophe; which means, there will be a catastrophic failure of tank every year. The tank could be the tank on your way to work, which supply the fuel to the garage from where you re-fill, the site where you or dear one works, the near to school or hospital. And this is happening, yes every year there is a major incident associated with storage tanks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
About Me
- SreeRaj R Nair
- Professional practising process safety and loss prevention. Areas of expertise include: • Hazard identification, Consequence modelling and analysis • Risk evaluation (qualitative and quantitative) • Identify and evaluate cost-effective engineering solutions to reduce or mitigate risk • Emergency planning and preparedness • HSE training and audits
Publications by Author
- Identifying Opportunities of Enhancing Safeguard Stewardship through IPL Rationalization, Global Congress on Process Safety, AIChE, March 2017
- Identifying and managing process risks related to biofule project and plants, HAZARDS XXII, April 2011
- Essence of the accuracy and acceptability of failure rate data in risk assessment, HAZARDS XXII, April 2011
- Improving process safety performance using process hazard information, ChemInnovations, Oct 2010
- Analysing the effectiveness of risk reduciton measures implemented, 13th Internationa Symposium on Loss prevention, June 2010
- Determining process safety performance indicators for major accident hazards using site process hazard information, HAZARDS XXI, Nov 2009
- Using predictive risk assessment to develop user-friendly tools for on-site and off-site emergency planning, HAZARDS XXi Nov 2009
- Process Safety - staying ahead, The Chemical Engineer, IChemE, Oct 2009
- SreeRaj R Nair, Determining the criteria for evaluation of toxic hazards, Journal of HSE and Fire Engineering, ASFE CUSAT, Issue 2 March 2009
- S R Nair, Methods of avoiding tank bund overtopping using computational fluid dynamics tool, Paper 40, Page 479-495, HAZARDS XX, April 2008
- Sreeraj R Nair, A review on Buncefield oil storage incident investigation, Petrosafe-07, April 2007
- Sreeraj R Nair, Safety studies through project life cycle, Fire and Safety Journal, ASFE CUSAT, October 2006
2 comments:
Hi SreeRaj,
Interesting article. While defining risk, why do you include the term 'opportunity' along with threat?
My idea is that there is a real risk (statistically determined) and perceived risk. So perception may not be part of risk definition? Whats your thought? I found this interesting article on net http://www.fraserinstitute.org/commerce.web/product_files/RealRisks.pdf
Hi Sreeraj...I think you will find the following articles on risk perception and communication interesting:
http://risk-safety.com/developing-trust-while-communicating-risks/
http://risk-safety.com/banana-%E2%80%93-build-absolutely-nothing-anywhere-near-anyone/
Post a Comment